Economics

No-load losses, load losses and the real cost of a transformer over 30 years

A transformer costs more to run than to buy. How to capitalise no-load and load losses with the A and B method, with a worked example for a 630 kVA unit – and why the cheapest offer is rarely the cheapest transformer.

September 16, 2026
The real cost of losses – Keynetgrid blog

A 630 kVA distribution transformer costs roughly as much as a mid-range car. Over its life it will convert several times that value into heat. Utilities have evaluated transformer losses in money for decades; industrial buyers rarely do. This article shows the method and why it changes purchasing decisions.

Two kinds of losses

  • No-load losses P0 (iron or core losses) arise from magnetising the core. They are constant whenever the transformer is energised – 8 760 hours a year – regardless of the load.
  • Load losses Pk (copper losses) are I²R losses in the windings plus stray losses. They vary with the square of the load: at 50 % load they are 25 % of the rated value.

The A/B capitalisation method

Each watt of loss is assigned a present value in euros. The buyer then compares offers on purchase price + A × P0 + B × Pk rather than on price alone.

A (€/W of no-load loss) = energy price × 8 760 h × annuity factor.
B (€/W of load loss) = A × (average load factor)².

Example assumptions: electricity 0.15 €/kWh, 30-year life, 5 % discount rate (annuity factor ≈ 15.4), average load 50 %.

  • A = 0.15 €/kWh × 8.76 kWh/W·a × 15.4 = 20.2 €/W
  • B = 20.2 × 0.5² = 5.1 €/W

Worked example: 630 kVA

Offer 1 – Tier 2 limit valuesOffer 2 – low-loss design
Purchase price9 500 €10 900 €
P0540 W430 W
Pk4 600 W4 600 W
Capitalised no-load losses (A = 20.2 €/W)10 900 €8 690 €
Capitalised load losses (B = 5.1 €/W)23 460 €23 460 €
Total cost of ownership43 860 €43 050 €

The dearer transformer is 810 € cheaper over its life – and the losses, at this load, are worth 3.5 times the purchase price. Note that the figures depend heavily on the load factor: for a transformer that idles most of the time (a rarely used backup feeder, a PV plant at night) the no-load term dominates; for a process plant at 80 % load the load-loss term does.

Prices in the table are illustrative. What matters is the method: ask for guaranteed P0 and Pk, insert your own energy price and load factor, and compare. Every PNACHO product page publishes both values so you can run the calculation before you request a quote.

Practical conclusions

  1. Never compare transformers on price alone – compare price plus capitalised losses.
  2. For lightly loaded transformers, pay for low P0. For heavily loaded ones, pay for low Pk.
  3. Do not oversize "to be safe": a 1 000 kVA unit at 30 % load has higher total losses than a 630 kVA unit at 50 %.
  4. Ask for the routine test report – guaranteed values are only worth something if they are measured on your unit.

Our engineers run this calculation for you: send the expected load profile and energy price with your enquiry, and we return the rating and the variant with the lowest total cost, not just the lowest price.

TCOcapitalised lossesno-load lossesload lossestender
Share this article

Request a quote for your PNACHO transformer

Send us rated power, voltages and the site of installation – our engineers will select the right configuration and send a quote within 24 hours.

See the range